THE USE OF MODERN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PREPARATION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problems of using associated with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the academic field, particularly in the preparation of scientific publications. An analysis of sources demonstrates that AI tools facilitate the automation of relevant literature searches, the processing of large data volumes, improvement of text quality, and identification of current scientific issues. However, their use raises concerns about academic integrity, calls into question the originality of scientific research, and challenges the notion of authorship in publications. Therefore, there is a need for further exploration of AI use in science, outlining its advantages and potential risks, as well as identifying strategies for addressing these challenges. To support these efforts, the "Artificial Intelligence Development Strategy in Ukraine for 2025–2030" is being implemented. The primary goal of this strategy is to integrate intelligent technologies into key sectors of national security and the economy. The article highlights the main benefits of using AI in the preparation of scientific publications, including assistance in identifying relevant research topics, the ability to model complex systems, improvement of scientific writing quality, support in processing large datasets and information flows, plagiarism detection, generation of visual content, and translation support. Additionally, the article provides a review and analysis of the most popular AI tools used by researchers for writing, editing, and publishing scientific work: Scopus AI and Web of Science Research Assistant for idea discovery, Elicit for scientific literature search and summarization, specialized platforms such as Writefull, Paperpal, and Grammarly, as well as widely used chat-based tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, Copy.ai, and Copilot, which assist in generating ideas, translations, and structuring of academic texts. Despite these advantages, the article also identifies several risks associated with the use of AI technologies: violations of scientific ethics, reliance on outdated or unverified sources, generation of incorrect results, and concerns about the protection of research data. The findings suggest that AI should be viewed as a supportive tool that can significantly enhance the efficiency of scientific research, streamline and improve academic workflows, but it cannot replace the creative approach, critical thinking, deep analysis, and scientific intuition of the researcher.