A MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE SECURITY OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Keywords: artificial intelligence, financial security, organizational and information model, generative AI, machine learning, financial stability, automation risks

Abstract

This article presents an organizational and information model (OIM) designed to analyze the security of the financial sector amid the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The model encompasses three key analytical blocks: traditional analytics, machine and deep learning, and generative AI (GenAI). It captures both the benefits and systemic risks stemming from AI's implementation in core areas of financial services, including intermediation, insurance, asset management, and payment systems. The research identifies enhanced efficiency, fraud detection, risk management, and personalized services as primary advantages of AI adoption. However, it also outlines critical vulnerabilities such as model opacity ("black box" effects), data bias, privacy threats, algorithmic collusion, systemic herding behavior, and hallucinations in AI-generated outputs. The study details how various AI technologies can reduce underwriting costs, improve credit scoring using unstructured data, and optimize high-frequency trading and liquidity management. At the same time, it highlights that reliance on uniform datasets and third-party providers introduces structural homogeneity and single points of failure, increasing systemic fragility. GenAI, with its speed, autonomy, and ubiquity, further amplifies these effects by enabling automation at an unprecedented scale. The article systematically classifies AI’s potential benefits, from regulatory compliance and predictive analytics to innovation in financial product development and transformation in fintech education. Moreover, the article addresses both micro-risks—such as cyber threats, data fragmentation, and discriminatory algorithmic outputs—and macro-risks, including labor market shocks, financial market procyclicality, and cascading failures. Through analysis of past financial disruptions and current empirical data, the article underscores the need for robust, transparent, and adaptive regulatory frameworks tailored to national contexts. The proposed OIM integrates actors, data sources, evaluation criteria, analytical tools, and principles into a cohesive model, with a specific submodel focusing on the interplay between AI technologies and financial stability.

References

AI and automation in financial reporting: Implementation guide. KPMG. 2024. URL: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmgsites/xx/pdf/2024/11/ai-in-finance-implementation-guide.pdf (accessed April 22, 2025).

Aldasoro I., Armantier O., Doerr S., Gambacorta L., Oliviero T. Survey evidence on gen AI and households: job prospects amid trust concerns. BIS Bulletin. 2024. № 86. URL:https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull86.pdf (accessed April 22, 2025).

Artificial intelligence, machine learning and big data in finance: Opportunities, challenges, and implications for policy makers. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2021. URL:https://www.oecd.org/finance/AI-ML-Big-Data-in-Finance.pdf (accessed April 22, 2025).

Babel B., et al. Derisking machine learning and artificial intelligence. McKinsey & Company. 2019. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/risk-and-resilience/our-insights/derisking-machine-learning-and-artificial-intelligence#/ (accessed April 22, 2025).

Bernhardt D. and Eckblad M. Stock Market Crash of 1987. Federal Reserve History. 2013. URL: https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/stock-market-crash-of-1987 (accessed April 22, 2025).

Cordova P., et al. Leveraging AI tools in finance education: exploring student perceptions, emotional reactions and educator experiences. Cogent Education. 2024. Vol. 11, No. 1. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2431885 (accessed April 22, 2025).

Csaszar F.A., et al. Artificial intelligence and strategic decision-making: Evidence from entrepreneurs and investors. Strategy Science. 2024. Vol. 9, No. 1. URL: https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/stsc.2024.0190 (accessed April 22, 2025).

Delgado D.M., French C., Renier J. IIF-EY 2023 Public Survey Report on AI/ML Use in Financial Services. Institute of International Finance (IIF). 2023. URL: https://www.iif.com/Publications/ID/5305/IIF-EY-2023-Public-Survey-Report-on-AI-and-ML-Use-in-Financial-Services (accessed April 22, 2025).

Odeyemi O., et al. Reviewing the role of AI in fraud detection and prevention in financial services. ResearchGate. 2024. Vol. 11(1). P. 2101–2110. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378297681_Reviewing_the_role_of_AI_in_fraud_detection_and_prevention_in_financial_services (accessed April 22, 2025).

What is AI hallucination? Understanding and mitigating AI hallucination. Geeksforgeeks. 2025. URL: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/what-is-ai-hallucination/ (accessed April 22, 2025).

Article views: 2
PDF Downloads: 1
Published
2025-03-31
How to Cite
Nedoboi, S. (2025). A MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE SECURITY OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Digital Есопоmу and Economic Security, (2 (17), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.32782/dees.17-22