MAIN COMPONENTS OF THE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ASSESSMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS MANAGEMENT
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to analyze, systematize and substantiate the main components of the assessment of key performance indicators of higher education institutions. Today, Ukraine needs to identify aspects that will fully and comprehensively allow us to understand the state of affairs in higher education institutions, in particular the effectiveness of their management. Therefore, the direction that should be investigated at the current stage of our country's development is highlighted, namely, the main components of the assessment of key performance indicators of higher education institutions. To conduct the outlined study, methods of analysis and synthesis were used, which allowed us to analyze, systematize and substantiate the main components of the assessment of key performance indicators of higher education institutions. The article considers the main components of the assessment of key performance indicators of higher education institutions. A large number of studies of the role of key performance indicators are presented, which combine an understanding of the significance of past events in constant changes and improvements in the process of effective management of higher education institutions. A historical excursion was conducted into key performance indicators, which should be the flagship for making management decisions by university management. The types of management qualities for managers of higher education institutions were analyzed, which are a necessary component of the process of effective management of them and should become significant factors in assessing the performance of universities. Some performance indicators in the higher education system of leading countries of the world were studied in relation to their KPIs. The problem of the shortage of specialists in the field of management effectiveness in higher education and the impracticality of regular management schemes in the university sector were highlighted. Therefore, knowledge of the problems of universities and assessment of their activities in accordance with the proposed conceptual framework are important. The country's new economic, social, and cultural planning thus made universities a leading figure.
References
Hubert D. Non-Maxwellian velocity distribution functions and incoherent scattering of radar waves in the auroral ionosphere. Journal of atmospheric and terrestrial physics. 1984. № 46(6-7). Р. 601-611.
Fiksel J. Designing resilient, sustainable systems. Environmental science & technology. 2003. № 37(23). P. 5330-5339.
Borden D. L. et al. Three-jet final states and measuring the gamma gamma width of the Higgs boson at a photon linear collider. Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 1994. № 50(7). P. 4499-4507.
Guy Ch. Quality time. Communications Engineer. 2005. № 3(1). P. 36-39.
Department of Education. National Strategy for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education in General and Further Education and Training. Creative Education. 2001. Vol. 13(3). https://www.westerncape.gov.za/text/2003/strategy_math_science_fet.pdf (дата звернення: 24.12.2024).
Mateu-Pérez R., Escobedo-Peiro P., García-Baldán M., Flores Buils R. Personal development of future teachers through resilience, emotional development and well-being using experiential learning. Journal of Education for Teaching. 2024. Р. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2024.2433648.
Aqsa J., Sarmad M. Empowering leadership and the role of work-related curiosity in employee job crafting behavior: the role of low gender egalitarianism. The Learning Organization. 2024. №31(6). Р. 1008-1030.
Huang J., Hsieh F., Chang Y.Ch., Tiede M. On the two rhotic schwas in Southwestern Mandarin: When homophony meets morphology in articulation. Phonetica. 2023. № 81(1). Р. 43-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2022-0036.
Birch A. H. Political integration and disintegration in the British Isles. George Allen & Unwin. 1977. 180 p.
Doug Sh., Gomes J. Performance indicators and university distance education providers. Journal of Distance Education. 1998. № 13. Р. 1-20.
Forest J. JF, Kinser K. Higher Education in the United States: An Encyclopedia. Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2002. 831 p.
Fang F. Crown-level mapping of tree species and health from remote sensing of rural and urban forests. Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. West Virginia University. 2019. 87 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.4068.
Fereydoon A. Qualitative Indicators for the evaluation of universities performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010. № 2(2). Р. 5408-5411.
Cave M. The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1997. 280 p.
Dolence M. G., Norris D. M. Using Key Performance Indicators to Drive Strategic Decision Making. New directions for institutional research. 1994. № 82. Р. 63-80.
Collin R. E. Field theory of guided waves. John Wiley & Sons. 1990. 50p.
Busin M. A new lamellar wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty surgery. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2003. № 121(2). Р. 260-265.
Kalaman O., Bondarenko, S., Telovata M., Petrenko N., Yershova O., Sagan O. Management of Digital and Intellectual Technologies Integration in Education Informatization. TEM Journal. 2023. Vol. 12 (3). P. 1645-1657.
Okulicz-Kozaryn W., Kalaman O. How to manage universities in Asia, Еast Europe and North America based on the preferences of students? Food Industry Economics. 2019. № 11. Р. 88-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15673/fie.v11i4.1551.
Vandan N. et al. Assessment of doctors' knowledge regarding tuberculosis management in Lucknow, India: A public–private sector comparison. Public health. 2009. № 123(7). Р. 484-489.
Steven S.J. et al. Design of bifunctional antibiotics that target bacterial rRNA and inhibit resistance-causing enzymes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2000. № 122(21). Р. 5230-5231.
Rubinson J., Pfeiffer M. Brand key performance indicators as a force for brand equity management. Journal of Advertising Research. 2005. № 45. Р.187-197.
