STRATEGY FOR SECURITY-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT OF ENTERPRISES IN UKRAINE: A COMPONENT APPROACH
Abstract
To develop a strategy for the security-oriented development of enterprises in Ukraine, it is proposed to use a component approach, which involves the allocation of individual components of the strategy. The main components of developing a strategy for the security-oriented development of enterprises are the idea of co-competition according to B. Neilbuff and A. Brandenburg, the PARTS model, and scenarios for modifying the elements of the PARTS model. Each of the components has not only advantages in the strategic management of the security-oriented development of enterprises, but also limitations that must be taken into account when developing appropriate strategies. The component-based approach to developing a strategy for the security-oriented development of enterprises in Ukraine ensures the flexibility of the strategy, allows adapting the methods, techniques and ways of developing the strategy to the specifics of the development of a particular enterprise while maintaining the theoretical foundations (the idea of co-competition, the PARTS model, etc.) in modern conditions. The purpose of co-competition in the strategy of security-oriented development of enterprises is to concentrate on a permanent (less often) or temporary (more often) basis common resources in counteracting real or potential threats to development. The condition for the effectiveness of co-competition in the implementation of the strategy of security-oriented development of enterprises is the separation of competition and cooperation in time, in different areas, by development vectors, etc. Co-competition in the implementation of the strategy of security-oriented development of enterprises is effective at the initial stages of strategy implementation. The peculiarity of using the PARTS model in the development of a strategy for the security-oriented development of enterprises is the ability to ensure the variability of the strategy by forming a number of scenarios of the model elements. Such scenarios describe possible future actions of enterprises to ensure their development depending on the projected changes in the conditions for the development of enterprises in Ukraine. By analyzing different scenarios, taking into account potential risks and opportunities, enterprises can better prepare and make informed decisions to ensure their development under conditions that have changed and therefore differ from those taken into account when the strategy was developed.
References
Клочковський О. В., Гуцол Д. С. Методологічні засади визначення пріоритетних напрямків розробки стратегії розвитку підприємства. Економiка i органiзацiя управлiння. 2022. № 3 (47). С. 47–56.
Porter Michael E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Illustrated edition. Free Press, 1998. 592 р.
Chandler Alfred D. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Massachusetts Institution of Technology: The Mit Press. 1963. 463 p. URL: https://s3.amazonaws.com/arena-attachments/705027/a973f694aaaee073aeb1cfce037f3b11.pdf
Отенко І. П., Комарков Д. В., Шкребень Р. П. Стратегічний інструментарій безпеко-орієнтованого розвитку підприємства. Проблеми економіки. 2018. № 2. С. 235–241. URL: https://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2018
Балахонова О. В., Руммо В. В., Гутарєва Ю. В. Узагальнення практичного досвіду проведення безпекоорієнтованих перетворень на промисловому підприємстві на основі принципів реструктуризації. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. 2020. № 46. С. 103–113. URL: http://www.vestnik-econom.mgu.od.ua/journal/2020/46-2020/14.pdf
Притис В. І., Гавловська Н. І., Рудніченко Є. М. Дослідження категорій безпекоорієнтованого підходу в управлінні підприємствами. Вісник Хмельницького національного університету. Серія: Економічні науки. 2019. № 2. С. 23–30.
Brandenburger A. M., Nalebuff B. J. Co-opetition: A revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation. New York : Currency Doubleday, 1997. 304 p. URL: https://www.management.com.ua/notes/managing-the-paradoxes-of-coopetition.html
Івченко А. Г. Безпекоорієнтований розвиток підприємства: вектори, можливості та загрози. Бізнес Інформ. 2023. № 12. C. 368–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-12-368-378
Парадокси співпраці конкурентів: як налагодити конструктивну взаємодію. URL: https://www.management.com.ua/notes/managing-the-paradoxes-of-coopetition.html
Hannah Douglas P., Eisenhardt Kathleen M. How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation. Special Issue. 2018. Volume 39. Issue 12. Р. 3163–3192. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/smj.2750
Klochkovskyi O. V., Hutsol D. S. (2022). Metodolohichni zasady vyznachennia priorytetnykh napriamkiv rozrobky stratehii rozvytku pidpryiemstva [Methodological principles of determining the priority areas of development of the company's development strategy]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia. № 3 (47). S. 47–56.
Porter Michael E. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Illustrated edition. Free Press, 1998. 592 p.
Chandler Alfred D. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Massachusetts Institution of Technology: The Mit Press. 1963. 463 p. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/arena-attachments/705027/a973f694aaaee073aeb1cfce037f3b11.pdf
Otenko I. P., Komarkov D. V., Shkreben R. P. (2018). Stratehichnyi instrumentarii bezpeko-oriientovanoho rozvytku pidpryiemstva [Strategic toolkit of security-oriented development of the enterprise]. Problemy ekonomiky. № 2. S. 235–241. Available at: https://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2018
Balakhonova O. V., Rummo V. V., Hutarieva Yu. V. (2020). Uzahalnennia praktychnoho dosvidu provedennia bezpekooriientovanykh peretvoren na promyslovomu pidpryiemstvi na osnovi pryntsypiv restrukturyzatsii [Generalization of the practical experience of carrying out safety-oriented transformations at an industrial enterprise based on the principles of restructuring]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. № 46. S. 103–113. Available at: http://www.vestnik-econom.mgu.od.ua/journal/2020/46-2020/14.pdf
Prytys V. I., Havlovska N. I., Rudnichenko Ye. M. (2019). Doslidzhennia katehorii bezpekooriientovanoho pidkhodu v upravlinni pidpryiemstvamy [Study of categories of safety-oriented approach in enterprise management]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky. № 2. S. 23–30.
Brandenburger A. M., Nalebuff B. J. Co-opetition: A revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation. New York : Currency Doubleday, 1997. 304 p. Available at: https://www.management.com.ua/notes/managing-the-paradoxes-of-coopetition.html
Ivchenko A. H. (2023). Bezpekooriientovanyi rozvytok pidpryiemstva: vektory, mozhlyvosti ta zahrozy [Security-oriented development of the enterprise: vectors, opportunities and threats]. Biznes Inform. № 12. S. 368–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-12-368-378
Paradoksy spivpratsi konkurentiv: yak nalahodyty konstruktyvnu vzaiemodiiu [Paradoxes of cooperation between competitors: how to establish constructive interaction]. Available at: https://www.management.com.ua/notes/managing-the-paradoxes-of-coopetition.html
Hannah Douglas P., Eisenhardt Kathleen M. How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. The Interplay of Competition and Cooperation. Special Issue. 2018. Volume 39. Issue 12. P. 3163–3192. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/smj.2750
