INTEGRATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND FORENSIC ECONOMIC EXPERTISE

  • Volodymyr Ivankov Forensic research institution
Keywords: forensic economic examination, methodology, standardization, procedures, digital evidence, digital information

Abstract

The growth of economic crimes in the modern business environment necessitates the modernization of forensic economic examination methods in the context of the use of information technology (IT). The current issues related to the utilization of digital evidence in criminal proceedings, as presented by forensic experts, are explored. Solutions obtained through methods of theoretical analysis, synthesis, and specialized cognitive methods are proposed. The article aims to deepen the theoretical and methodological aspects of forensic economic examination in the context of integration into a digitized environment. Drawing from various scientific sources, this study identifies key areas of forensic science that require modification of techniques and procedures. The tools of digital forensics in the investigation of economic crimes are analyzed, taking into account digital formats of financial transactions. Critical IT-related problems are grouped into several categories: data breaches and cybersecurity, digital forensics and electronic evidence, blockchain and cryptocurrencies, digital accounting and financial systems, regulatory compliance and the admissibility of digital evidence in court, social engineering, phishing attacks, insider threats, and inappropriate employee behavior. The relationship between these issues and forensic research is revealed, considering the influence of information technology. Solutions have been proposed to modernize the procedures of forensic economic examination for each object of examination. The feasibility of standardizing forensic and economic procedures of digital databases is substantiated, providing the opportunity to stay ahead of new threats and guarantee the integrity of digital evidence based on industry standards. The experience of standardizing forensic procedures in the United States, European Union countries, and Australia may be useful in reforming Ukrainian legislation and developing guidelines for the use of digital evidence. It was found that the rapid change in information technologies for identifying, seizing, recording, and researching digital information poses certain difficulties for forensic economic experts in Ukraine. It is recommended to improve the efficiency of using digital evidence in legal proceedings by developing guidelines for working with it and enhancing the qualifications of forensic experts.

References

Фісуненко, Н. (2023). Цифрові трансформації в Україні: євроінтеграційні процеси та сучасні вимоги світу. Цифрова економіка та економічна безпека, (8 (08), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.32782/dees.8-8

Ночвіна І.О. Цифровізація економіки: можливості та основні загрози. Зб. наук. праць ХНПУ імені Г.С. Сковороди «Економіка». 2021. Вип. 19. С. 90–97.

Філіпенко Н. Є. Інформаційні системи в судово-експертній діяльності. Теорія та практика судової експертизи і криміналістики. 2018. Том 18 (2018), с. 271-281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2018.31

Журавель В. А. Автоматизовані інформаційні системи як засіб забезпечення ефективності досудового розслідування. Tеорія та практика судової експертизи і криміналістики. 2015. Випуск 15. С. 13-21

Huber, W.D. and DiGabriele, J.A. (2014). Research in forensic accounting – what matters?, Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, Vol. 10 No. 1.

Barrett, N. (2005), “Computer forensics as a corporate governance tool”, IQ Magazine – Records Management Association of Australia, Vol. 21 No. 2.

Авдєєва, Г., Живуцька-Козловська, Е. (2023). Проблеми використання цифрових доказів у кримінальному судочинстві України та США. Теорія та практика судової експертизи і криміналістики. Вип. 1 (30). С. 126—143. DOI: 10.32353/khrife.1.2023.07.

Upward, F. (2000), “Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes and beyond – a personal reflection”, Records Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 115-39.

Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence (SWGDE). (2018). Digital and Multimedia Evidence Terminology. SWGDE Best Practices for Digital and Multimedia Evidence. URL: https://www.swgde.org/documents/published-complete-listing (дата звернення 10.12.2023)

Marrington, A. (2015). Machine Learning in Computer Forensics: A Case Study in the Use of a Random Forest Classifier for Identifying Digital Image Source. Digital Investigation, 13, 93-103.

Цифрові компетенції як умова формування якості людського капіталу (2019): аналіт. зап. / [В. С. Куйбіда, О. М. Петроє, Л. І. Федулова, Г. О. Андрощук]. Київ: НАДУ. 28 с.

Forensic Science Regulator’s Code of Practice 2023. URL: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/forensic-science-regulator-act-2021-and-forensic-science-regulators-code-practice (дата звернення 10.12.2023)

Standards Australia. (2018). AS/NZS 4885:2018, Forensic Analysis – General Procedures for the Examination of Digital Evidence. URL: file:///C:/Users/Irina/Downloads/Australia%20and%20New%20Zealand%20Guidelines%20for%20Digital%20Imaging%20Processes%202013%20(1).pdf (дата звернення 10.12.2023)

Fisunenko, N. (2023). Tsyfrovi transformatsii v ukraini: yevrointehratsiini protsesy ta suchasni vymohy svitu.[ Digital transformations in Ukraine: European integration processes and modern requirements of the world.] Tsyfrova ekonomika ta ekonomichna bezpeka, (8 (08), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.32782/dees.8-8 [in Ukrainian]

Nochvina I.O. (2021). Tsyfrovizatsiia ekonomiky: mozhlyvosti ta osnovni zahrozy [Digitalization of the economy: opportunities and main threats]. Zb. nauk. prats KhNPU imeni H.S. Skovorody «Ekonomika», 19, 90–97[in Ukrainian]

Filipenko N. Ye. (2018). Informatsiini systemy v sudovo-ekspertnii diialnosti. [Information systems in forensic expert activity.] Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vol 18 , 271-281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2018.31[in Ukrainian]

Zhuravel V. A. (2015). Avtomatyzovani informatsiini systemy yak zasib zabezpechennia efektyvnosti dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. [Automated information systems as a means of ensuring the effectiveness of pre-trial investigation.] Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vol 15., 13-21[in Ukrainian]

Huber, W.D. and DiGabriele, J.A. (2014). Research in forensic accounting – what matters?, Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, Vol. 10 No. 1.

Barrett, N. (2005), “Computer forensics as a corporate governance tool”, IQ Magazine – Records Management Association of Australia, Vol. 21 No. 2.

Avdieieva, H., Zhyvutska-Kozlovska, E. (2023). Problemy vykorystannia tsyfrovykh dokaziv u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy ta SShA. [Problems of using digital evidence in criminal justice in Ukraine and the USA.] Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky, 1 (30), 126-143. DOI: 10.32353/khrife.1.2023.07. [in Ukrainian]

Upward, F. (2000), “Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes and beyond – a personal reflection”, Records Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 115-39.

Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence (SWGDE). (2018). Digital and Multimedia Evidence Terminology. SWGDE Best Practices for Digital and Multimedia Evidence. Available at: https://www.swgde.org/documents/published-complete-listing (accessed December 10, 2023)

Marrington, A. (2015). Machine Learning in Computer Forensics: A Case Study in the Use of a Random Forest Classifier for Identifying Digital Image Source. Digital Investigation, 13, 93-103.

Tsyfrovi kompetentsii yak umova formuvannia yakosti liudskoho kapitalu (2019) [Digital competences as a condition for the formation of the quality of human capital]: analyst. zap / [V. S. Kuybida, O. M. Petroye, L. I. Fedulova, G. O. Androschuk]. Kyiv: NADU. 28 p. [in Ukrainian]

Forensic Science Regulator’s Code of Practice 2023. Available at: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/forensic-science-regulator-act-2021-and-forensic-science-regulators-code-practice (accessed December 10, 2023)

Standards Australia. (2018). AS/NZS 4885:2018, Forensic Analysis – General Procedures for the Examination of Digital Evidence. Available at: file:///C:/Users/Irina/Downloads/Australia%20and%20New%20Zealand%20Guidelines%20for%20Digital%20Imaging%20Processes%202013%20(1).pdf (accessed December 10, 2023)

Article views: 53
PDF Downloads: 57
Published
2023-11-27
How to Cite
Ivankov, V. (2023). INTEGRATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND FORENSIC ECONOMIC EXPERTISE. Digital Есопоmу and Economic Security, (9 (09), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.32782/dees.9-17