ADAPTING THE BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP MATRIX TO ANALYZE FINANCIAL RESULTS
Abstract
Boston Consulting Group Matrix is the most famous and popular methodical tool for corporate portfolio analysis among practitioners. However, the methods of using the Matrix were subjected to numerous criticisms and the peak of popularity of this methodical tool has passed. The purpose of the article is to determine new directions for using the Boston Consulting Group Matrix (BCG) in the economic analysis of business activity. The tasks of the research are the adaptation of the classical BCG matrix to use in the conditions of incomplete information as to the market of a specific product, as well as the modification of this method depending on the objects of the study. The following research methods were used: monographic (when studying the theoretical and methodological foundations of Boston Consulting Group Matrix classical methods); dialectical, abstract and logical (for theoretical generalizations regarding the identifying the methods’ drawbacks and ways to overcome them, formulation of conclusions); graphical and tabular (when presenting research results). It has been substantiated that the use of the traditional BCG matrix method is limited due to the ambiguity of conceptual principles, methodological problems and the lack of complete information about the activities of competitors. It has been proven that inaccuracies in the analysis of the market growth rate and the relative share of individual subjects on it make it impossible to assess accurately business prospects in this area. A modification of the BCG matrix has been proposed, which distributes the assortment units of the analyzed subject of activity according to the determined reserves of profit growth. Depending on the objects of specific analysis, grouping in the modified matrix can be conducted according to individual types of products (goods, works, and services). The main problems that arise at applying the BCG matrix were specified and systematized. Ways to eliminate certain drawbacks of the traditional BCG matrix, in particular, regarding the method of calculating the indicators included in it, were determined. The modification of the BCG matrix has been proposed, which classifies types of products (goods, works or services) according to prospective profit reserves and changes in their share in the company’s profit structure. The similar matrix has been developed for the classification of buyers of goods or consumers of the company’s services. The place of the proposed modification of the BCG matrix in the economic analysis was determined. The proposed variations of the BCG matrix have an advantage in comparison with the classical version because they are based on the internal analysis of only one business entity, and not on assessing the potential of competitors. The developed modification of the analysis methodology can be integrated into the system of the complex economic analysis of any company. The results of the analysis using the modified BCG matrix can be used in financial strategic planning and in the development of the marketing strategy, in particular when planning advertising campaigns.
References
Boston Consulting Group. What Is the Growth Share Matrix? 2022. URL: https://www.bcg.com/about/overview/our-history/growth-share-matrix.
Madsen, Dag. Not dead yet: The rise, fall and persistence of the BCG Matrix. Problems and Perspectives in Management, № 15. 2017. Рр. 19–34. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.02.
Tien, Nguyen. Business analysis for Dat Xanh real estate group based on BCG matrix. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation. № 03(02), 2022. Рр. 344–351.
Son, Myeong-Soo & Park, Sang-Hyeon. Securing Amazon's Sustainable Competitiveness and Strategic Analysis : Based on the BCG matrix and 6C development strategy. KBM Journal. № 6. 2022. Рр. 83–97. URL: https://doi.org/10.51858/KBMJ.2022.02.6.1.83.
Nurfitriya, M., Koeswandi, T.A.L., Fauziyah, A., & Budiman, A. West Java Leading Product Position: BCG Matrix Analysis. In A. Herwany, E. Febrian, A. Gunardi, & D. R. Indika (Eds.). Economic and Development. Jakarta: Redwhite Press. 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.32698/ICRED.0482.
Zhang, Y.C., Gong, X.Z., Liu, Y., Zhou, L.W. Screening of Energy-Saving Technologies for Cement Production Based on Boston Consulting Group Matrix. MSF. 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1035.988.
Iryna Heiets, Tamara Oleshko, Oleg Leshchinsky. Airline-within-Airline business model and strategy: case study of Qantas Group. Transportation Research Procedia. № 56. 2021. Рр. 96–109. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.09.012.
Yu-Chun Chang, Wei-Hao Lee, Chi-Hung Wu. Potential opportunities for Asian airports to develop self-connecting passenger markets. Journal of Air Transport Management. № 77. 2019. Рр. 7–16. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.02.001.
Soo Won Mo, Kwang Bae Lee, Yong Joo Lee, Hong Gyun Park. Analysis of import changes through shift-share, location quotient and BCG techniques: Gwangyang Port in Asia. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. № 36(3). 2020. Рр. 145–156. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2020.01.001.
K. Chandrasekhar Iyer, V.P.S. Nihar Nanyam. Concentration analysis of container terminals in India. Maritime Transport Research. № 2, 100037. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2021.100037. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X21000289.
Moritz Belling, Ulrich Pidun, Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß. Restructuring in family firms: Balancing family objectives and economic prosperity. Long Range Planning, 102184. 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102184.
Michael R. Czinkota, Michael Ursic. Classification of exporting firms according to sales and growth into a share matrix. Journal of Business Research. № 22(3). 1991. Рр. 243–253. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90005-I.
Krikor Ohannessian. BCG Matrix. 2008. URL: https://krikor.info/?tag=business.
Gorb O., Dorohan-Pysarenko, L., Yehorova, O., Yasnolob, I., & Doroshenko, A. Boston consulting group matrix: Opportunities for use in economic analysis. Scientific Horizons. № 25(7). 2022. Рр. 20-30. URL: https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.25(7).2022.хх-х.
Boston Consulting Group. (2022). What Is the Growth Share Matrix? Available at: https://www.bcg.com/about/overview/our-history/growth-share-matrix.
Madsen, Dag. (2017). Not dead yet: The rise, fall and persistence of the BCG Matrix. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15, 19–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.02.
Tien, Nguyen. (2022). Business analysis for Dat Xanh real estate group based on BCG matrix. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 03(02), 344–351.
Son, Myeong-Soo & Park, Sang-Hyeon. (2022). Securing Amazon's Sustainable Competitiveness and Strategic Analysis : Based on the BCG matrix and 6C development strategy. KBM Journal, 6, 83–97. 10.51858/KBMJ.2022.02.6.1.83.
Nurfitriya, M., Koeswandi, T.A.L., Fauziyah, A., & Budiman, A. (2020). West Java Leading Product Position: BCG Matrix Analysis. In A. Herwany, E. Febrian, A. Gunardi, & D. R. Indika (Eds.), Economic and Development. Jakarta: Redwhite Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32698/ICRED.0482.
Zhang, Y.C., Gong, X.Z., Liu, Y., Zhou, L.W. (2021). Screening of Energy-Saving Technologies for Cement Production Based on Boston Consulting Group Matrix. MSF. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1035.988.
Iryna Heiets, Tamara Oleshko, Oleg Leshchinsky. (2021). Airline-within-Airline business model and strategy: case study of Qantas Group. Transportation Research Procedia, 56, 2021, 96–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.09.012.
Yu-Chun Chang, Wei-Hao Lee, Chi-Hung Wu (2019). Potential opportunities for Asian airports to develop self-connecting passenger markets. Journal of Air Transport Management, 77, 7–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.02.001.
Soo Won Mo, Kwang Bae Lee, Yong Joo Lee, Hong Gyun Park. (2020). Analysis of import changes through shift-share, location quotient and BCG techniques: Gwangyang Port in Asia. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(3), 145–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2020.01.001.
K. Chandrasekhar Iyer, V.P.S. Nihar Nanyam. (2021). Concentration analysis of container terminals in India. Maritime Transport Research, 2, 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2021.100037. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X21000289.
Moritz Belling, Ulrich Pidun, Dodo zu Knyphausen-Aufseß. (2022). Restructuring in family firms: Balancing family objectives and economic prosperity. Long Range Planning, 102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102184.
Michael R. Czinkota, Michael Ursic. (1991). Classification of exporting firms according to sales and growth into a share matrix. Journal of Business Research, 22(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90005-I.
Krikor Ohannessian. (2008). BCG Matrix. Available at: https://krikor.info/?tag=business.
Gorb O., Dorohan-Pysarenko, L., Yehorova, O., Yasnolob, I., & Doroshenko, A. (2022). Boston consulting group matrix: Opportunities for use in economic analysis. Scientific Horizons, 25(7), 20-30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.25(7).2022.хх-х.